Today, the minimum wage rises to
$7.25 an hour, boosting more than 2 million hardworking employees one
step up the ladder of economic opportunity.
The working poor
needed this increase. Minimum-wage workers have fallen further and
further behind the cost of living. In today's dollars, adjusting by the
Consumer Price Index, the 1968 minimum wage would be equivalent to
$10.08, half again as much as yesterday's minimum wage of $6.55. So
compared to where we were yesterday, today's increase is a very welcome
step in the right direction.
Nevertheless, this increase still
falls short of what is needed. Nowhere in the United States - and
certainly not in a generally high-cost state like Maryland - can anyone
cover bare subsistence bills on the minimum wage, even at $7.25 an
hour.
It is often said that the best anti-poverty program is a
job. But what if that job locks the employee into poverty? Consider a
relative of mine who works for minimum wage in a grocery store, as does
her boyfriend. They'd like to get married and get a house together and
live some small piece of the American dream. But they cannot even begin
to afford it. And so, both of them live with their parents - who are on
fixed incomes - and wait for what they hope will be a better day. But
on the current minimum wage, it is doubtful that day will ever come.
Opponents
of a livable minimum wage claim that jobs will be eliminated by
employers unable to pay the increased wage. This argument falls apart
under scrutiny. Economists at the University of California at Berkeley
compared job availability for teenagers in metropolitan areas that fall
on two sides of a state line, with the lower federal minimum wage in
one state and a new, higher state minimum on the other. They found
employers on both sides of the line just as likely to hire teenagers
and no net loss of teen employment on the side with the higher minimum
wage.
Similarly, broader studies show that during the last two
recessions, there were actually more jobs created in the states with
minimum wages above the federal level than in states where wages
remained lower, according to the Economic Policy Institute. And the
majority of minimum wage workers are not teenagers; many are women
supporting families.
Yes, some small businesses will strain
to meet payroll after today's raise. But far more small businesses will
gain customers and revenue now that 2.2 million workers have $5.5
billion more to spend in the coming year.
Beyond the economic
arguments for an increase, there is a moral argument. Every major
religious tradition finds poverty unacceptable - a violation of the
Golden Rule, a disregard for the justice emphasized by sacred texts and
disrespect for sisters and brothers created in the image of God. In the
sacred texts of the Jewish and Christian traditions, God demands fair
treatment of workers and harshly judges instances of economic
injustice.
This moral imperative is shared by other people of
faith. That's why more than 500 leaders of diverse religious traditions
have joined together under the banner of Let Justice Roll and signed a
letter to Congress calling for another increase in the minimum wage. We
are urging Congress to raise the minimum wage to $10 an hour in 2010.
This would bring the minimum wage up to or close to a living wage for
most workers.
By raising the minimum wage to $7.25 an hour, this
nation took one more step in the direction of justice for all. But this
must not be the last step we take.
The Rev. Ken
Brooker-Langston, a minister in the Christian Church (Disciples of
Christ), is the director of the Disciples Justice Action Network and a
board member of the Let Justice Roll Living Wage Campaign. He and his
family live in Annapolis.
A Step on the Path to Justice
Op-ed by Ken Brooker-Langston
Baltimore Sun, Jul 24 2009
Baltimore Sun, Jul 24 2009
© 2009 Ken Brooker-Langston





